Which of the following garments is NOT required for pesticides labeled "Caution"?

Which of the following garments is NOT required for pesticides labeled "Caution"?

• A. Long-sleeved shirt
• B. Gloves
• C. Face shield
• D. Long pants

Answer: (C)

The correct choice identifies the face shield as a garment that is not required when handling pesticides labeled "Caution." Pesticides categorized this way typically signify a lower level of toxicity compared to those labeled with higher caution levels. While personal protective equipment (PPE) is still important for safety, the requirements are less stringent for “Caution” compared to more hazardous substances. Long-sleeved shirts, gloves, and long pants are generally recommended or required to protect the skin from potential exposure, which is critical even with moderately toxic pesticides. However, a face shield is not universally mandated for all substances labeled “Caution,” as it is more commonly required for handling products with higher toxicity levels where there is a greater risk of splashes or inhalation of harmful substances. Therefore, the face shield is not considered a necessary part of the protective attire in this case.

The correct choice identifies the face shield as a garment that is not required when handling pesticides labeled "Caution." Pesticides categorized this way typically signify a lower level of toxicity compared to those labeled with higher caution levels. While personal protective equipment (PPE) is still important for safety, the requirements are less stringent for “Caution” compared to more hazardous substances.

Long-sleeved shirts, gloves, and long pants are generally recommended or required to protect the skin from potential exposure, which is critical even with moderately toxic pesticides. However, a face shield is not universally mandated for all substances labeled “Caution,” as it is more commonly required for handling products with higher toxicity levels where there is a greater risk of splashes or inhalation of harmful substances. Therefore, the face shield is not considered a necessary part of the protective attire in this case.